
January 13, 2009
Thoughts on Palestine
A Peace-worker finds grounds for compassion on both sides. In these two communities we have people who are Occupied in two different ways. As Allen Ginsberg put it, "They are the two children of the same hook-nosed God."
I don't think Peace, or even national defense, can come from the imagination of the enemy’s evil. Peace comes from seeing good where good was hidden, and urging it out into the public air with more power than bombs. Gentleness needs to go everywhere, into every basement and attic, along the cracks in prayer walls and floors, out to the edge of every tree-branch. Peace is hard work. Starting it is like massaging a rock.
Part of the despair we feel is that political leaders don't bring out that gentle good. They seem partnered in a death duet with the commercial media - who shame the goodness away, preferring anguish and videogenic fear. What about the visceral goodness of loved ones for each other - say, a mother for her child who is safe at home. How is the deep recognition we can have for that love - how is that care made public? Kept public. Pushed across every desk and up every gun barrel? But we now fetishize (in fact PAY TO SEE, like porn) the horror-moment when that strongest of all bonds of love is broken by unexpected death. That’s on the fronts of newspapers on the table in front of me right now. This is entertainment? This is news? The shock of the death of a child that was loved? That amazed expression of that child's parents?
But we didn’t feature the love that preceded this shock. The unbearable cease-fire in Gaza preceded it, with the love there hidden out of sight. Now, I am a consumerized American, so I am behind my own wall and suffer from perspective distortions. I must remember that the cease-fire was colonization and that Americans and most other people refuse to live that way, and we certainly embraced a warrior and martyr culture when faced with it. But then, the love in Israel and American families preceded these attacks too, and that goodness couldn’t enter Gaza and manifest as Peace, either. The love would have to grow from both sides and dissolve the wall. If we HAD found and studied and made more powerful the love on both sides of the wall FIRST, then the outrageous logic that brings this carnage wouldn't have it's critical mass of political approval.
How is it that the tenderness, the tone of peaceful love, evolved in two directions, became separated and finally foreign on the two sides of the wall? How did that happen? The cultures keep the birthing and mothering far away, as far away as possible. The missiles and young conscripts cross the border to do their duty and be glorious. But mothers and their children are the best place to start a Peace process - more effective than discussions of borders, guns, and inspections. All those details should flow from goodwill already established. Most of the Peace in the world is powerful while it is unspoken. The murder of civilians doesn't occur to anyone as an option. But now we have no Peace leaders anymore, and the cultivation of such silence, the caring for the very young as the first fact of life, that single thing that should overwhelm even a Holocaust and a Catastrophe, is stopped at our tragic border.
Wouldn't most mothers say - "Go into rooms and throw shoes at each other. Yes, but no guns."
Now Peace must be re-introduced somehow. We have to be those leaders ourselves, don't we... We do have that feeling our mothers and our children and our peaceful homes. We remember this, don’t’ we? – that visceral love - from our early lives. So we do have the substance that makes Peace, we carry it in us. It can push through these walls we face more easily than a bullet. Amen?
--- God! This is awful. We need to stop killing these children NOW.
I don't think Peace, or even national defense, can come from the imagination of the enemy’s evil. Peace comes from seeing good where good was hidden, and urging it out into the public air with more power than bombs. Gentleness needs to go everywhere, into every basement and attic, along the cracks in prayer walls and floors, out to the edge of every tree-branch. Peace is hard work. Starting it is like massaging a rock.
Part of the despair we feel is that political leaders don't bring out that gentle good. They seem partnered in a death duet with the commercial media - who shame the goodness away, preferring anguish and videogenic fear. What about the visceral goodness of loved ones for each other - say, a mother for her child who is safe at home. How is the deep recognition we can have for that love - how is that care made public? Kept public. Pushed across every desk and up every gun barrel? But we now fetishize (in fact PAY TO SEE, like porn) the horror-moment when that strongest of all bonds of love is broken by unexpected death. That’s on the fronts of newspapers on the table in front of me right now. This is entertainment? This is news? The shock of the death of a child that was loved? That amazed expression of that child's parents?
But we didn’t feature the love that preceded this shock. The unbearable cease-fire in Gaza preceded it, with the love there hidden out of sight. Now, I am a consumerized American, so I am behind my own wall and suffer from perspective distortions. I must remember that the cease-fire was colonization and that Americans and most other people refuse to live that way, and we certainly embraced a warrior and martyr culture when faced with it. But then, the love in Israel and American families preceded these attacks too, and that goodness couldn’t enter Gaza and manifest as Peace, either. The love would have to grow from both sides and dissolve the wall. If we HAD found and studied and made more powerful the love on both sides of the wall FIRST, then the outrageous logic that brings this carnage wouldn't have it's critical mass of political approval.
How is it that the tenderness, the tone of peaceful love, evolved in two directions, became separated and finally foreign on the two sides of the wall? How did that happen? The cultures keep the birthing and mothering far away, as far away as possible. The missiles and young conscripts cross the border to do their duty and be glorious. But mothers and their children are the best place to start a Peace process - more effective than discussions of borders, guns, and inspections. All those details should flow from goodwill already established. Most of the Peace in the world is powerful while it is unspoken. The murder of civilians doesn't occur to anyone as an option. But now we have no Peace leaders anymore, and the cultivation of such silence, the caring for the very young as the first fact of life, that single thing that should overwhelm even a Holocaust and a Catastrophe, is stopped at our tragic border.
Wouldn't most mothers say - "Go into rooms and throw shoes at each other. Yes, but no guns."
Now Peace must be re-introduced somehow. We have to be those leaders ourselves, don't we... We do have that feeling our mothers and our children and our peaceful homes. We remember this, don’t’ we? – that visceral love - from our early lives. So we do have the substance that makes Peace, we carry it in us. It can push through these walls we face more easily than a bullet. Amen?
--- God! This is awful. We need to stop killing these children NOW.


Comments
a response
Here are some thoughts on your piece, which I feel honored to respond to.
First I think it's really important that you are speaking out on this - however and whatever you choose to say. We all should: what is happening there is a scandal.
Ok, my first thought is that the claim that both "sides" are occupied is a complicated one. The way I see it: only one side is actually occupied (Palestine), and that political occupation is the heart of the conflict. Yes, both sides are in turmoil, under siege, in conflict, and suffer terribly. But the word occupation needs to mean what it means here.
I am keeping "sides" in quotation only because I suspect there are many sides on both sides.
I am thinking about the move you make to appeal to mothers and children as the place from which to imagine peace. On a basic gut level, this makes perfect sense to me and is my knee jerk response too: if we could see everyone as someone's child, with the eyes of a mother that would do everything to protect them, couldn't we get beyond some of the hatred?
But then I am corrected by two problems with this as a way to appeal to the side of the angels.
This move places motherhood in a place before and beyond politics, better than politics. A place of the home, before the child leaves and is pulled into the horrors of ideological and actual warfare. At what cost do we position mothers this way? Many political movements have politicized motherhood as the place from which to speak truth to power, so to speak, as though that love were outside and beyond ideology.
The Mothers of the Plaza de Mayo of Buenose Aires are the famous example. Diana Taylor of the Hemispheric Institute - writes about the Madres as being "trapped in bad scripts": the sanctity or "purity" of motherhood gives them legitimacy in the eyes of society; but in speaking "as" mothers, they rehearse, repeat and reaffirm certain ideas of what motherhood is, and how its values are anathema to a (male) public and political sphere. In a painful way, in order to be heard at all, they are forced to play into the very conservative values in whose name their children were disappeared.
Putting aside the whole question of where the fathers are here - I wonder what would happen if we didn't imagine the productivity of the mother's love only inside that home, away from politics and the public. What if we imagined them elsewhere? Perhaps in the places where they leave that home, where the mother guides the child in his/her relationship with a larger world? Where motherhood is already public, political? That motherhood (parenthood) interests me much more as a model for imagining peace. And that form of parenting is much less about some essential bond between mother and child, and makes room for others to become parents and caretakers too.
And then there's the problem of the mothers who send their children to war. A lot of them. Who don't protect them from war, but feel pride in sending them off to war. They are all over this country -- all over Israel and all over the occupied territories. Is there a message about peace that would reach those mothers, for those children?
None of this disagrees with you. I just question the appeal to that "basic" love between mother and child, because I am not sure it really works that way. I fear that mothers won't be able to imagine a more radical, political motherhood until we get her love and protection out of the supposedly "safe" space of the home and out in public. Mothers (parents, fathers, caregivers) that lead their children, not just protect them.
All best to and yours, Jill
--
Jill Lane • Assistant Professor, Spanish and Portuguese New York
University • Deputy Director, Hemispheric Institute of Performance and
Politics, www.institutohemisferico.org • Editor, e-misférica:
emisférica.org
Why?
Why we continue to support Israel is beyond me, on a moral level. "When Israel attacks Palestine, it is American missiles that smash through Palestinian homes." Why do we continue to tolerate this? Israeli nationalism has spread throughout the world; a coy and deceptive marketing campaign. Israel wraps itself in the shroud of the Holocaust, and it's sins are forgiven? This makes no sense, and I am disgusted.
However, I do not want to make it seem as if I am somehow placing collective blame on individuals. The people of Israel are afraid, and rightfully so; the Arab world despises them, and as a result their nation is surrounded by enemies. The Israeli gov. and media has heightened this fear, and they encourage people to respond to it with aggressive nationalism. True, people tend to be sheep, but there is no blame in this.
All else aside, there is one question we need to ask: "WHERE ARE THE LEADERS?" Where are the men and women who can think beyond their own lives, and their own personal advantage? Where are those who have the courage to act from compassion, rather than fear?
I have to disagree with you (again), Bill: For some the murdering of civilians is an option, and the most practical one at that. Gone are the days when armies chose to engage on open, empty fields. We live in the age of punitive war.
"We do have that feeling our
Rev, I disagree here,
not all of us remember, not all of us share such memories of peaceful homes.
How about the base of peace within, then?
However, I found myself touched by your quest for gentleness and common sense while they seem to have gotten all out of sight. Thank you!
Remembering that feeling
Sometimes I don't know either, whether I truly remember those feelings. If we cannot recall love, don't have a mother or family memory to tap into - then how do we find forgiveness, tenderness, allowance of the other -- the parts of Peace? Is the answer that we love in the present tense? Find it in our immediate lives and create more of it? And then the original love that raised us might be recalled somehow.
Clearly nations are not remembering, not re-inforcing the notion of Peace. But it seems to me that nation-states start with a kind of love. They are people who want to live together, and they all say in their independence writings, LIVE IN PEACE. There are elements of Peace in the thoughts of, say, Thomas Paine and Thomas Jefferson at the birth of the United States, and also in the writings of Theodor Herzl in his early hopes that Israel would be a leader of Peace in the world - to use the example of two countries who now can't remember...
As SeaQ says a couple comments ago, our leaders act out of fear, not the bravery of compassion. Obama simply has not spoken, as the deaths rise so quickly, and so many of the casulties are children. He was the Peace candidate. This leaves us responsible ourselves.
Does it take a crisis?
If the answer is "yes", can we change that aspect of human nature within ourselves? If so, will it be our cherished memories that give us the key by which we can change? Is it some unrealized idea, still lurking in the back of our group consciousness, which will save us?
Who can solve the puzzle that will unlock our full potential as individuals? Some hope for an Event, or a Person, to bring about change for them, and then feel guilt, shame, or anger when this does not occur. But really, is there blame in such a situation? Can you blame someone for feeling hope?
How many people have died in the name of self-defense? How many more will die simply because a few elites are scared, pissed, or greedy? Modern war amounts to bombing families until one army loses the will to fight. "Shock and Awe" and all that. Precision warfare that targets civilians. Satellite intelligence and not-so -under-the -table military aid. A pile of dead kids in a field of daisy cutters.
It's all too much like a video game or a movie, right? Keep thinking about it in that context and maybe, someday, someone will drag you out of your home in the middle of the night...for no reason. Maybe someone will call you an insurgent/traitor/terrorist, and "accidentally" shoot one of your family members. Maybe then you will have a reason to do something besides take a trip to the mall.
But.... let’s not let it come to that. :) Let's all go in search of that dream that won't allow such a thing to happen, anywhere.
Happy MLK Day,
---SeaQ
Post new comment